This is the type of question that would be very Floral skull I garden so I don’t choke people save a life send mulch shirt difficult to answer definitively, using quantitative metrics. If you’re going to pursue that inquiry, though, you’d have to examine preventive measures (keeping people healthy) vs reactive measures (curing the sick). Generally speaking (and this is strictly my own opinion), preventing a problem should be less expensive than fixing one that already exists. So if you pursue that line of thought, saving lives in response to things like natural disasters and famine relief would be ruled out as the most cost-effective. Not that those issues shouldn’t be addressed, but let’s assume that in pure economical terms, it would have been cheaper to prevent those situations in the first place.
Floral skull I garden so I don’t choke people save a life send mulch shirt, sweater, hoodie, and ladies tee
Best Floral skull I garden so I don’t choke people save a life send mulch shirt
Continuing along this path, one has to assume that economies Floral skull I garden so I don’t choke people save a life send mulch shirt of scale to have to play into the equation. Per your example, an anti-suicide intervention requires a unique solution each time, while a malaria vaccine uses nearly the same solution every time. Thus, solutions for curing malaria can be produced more efficiently than solutions for preventing suicide. So this leaves us with preventative measures that affect large masses of people, in which the same solution can be applied to large masses of people. Naturally, the next question is: Which causes of death meet these criteria? To make this answer further, we’d also need to define what is meant by “save”. If a 73 years old is cured of malaria, only to die at 75 from.